jueves, 19 de noviembre de 2015

Découvre ton cœur depuis la Seine.


The recent shocking events that have taken place in Paris are the consequence of the wrong-doings the NATO have taken in their international security politic. We couldn’t have foreseen that Stade de France, Baclatan etc. would be struck by terrorism last Friday, but a situation like that was already in the grid of international defense organizations. The threat now has put Europe on the edge of anger and panic, and all men know a combination of these both plus any kind of power don’t result in good things; just look back at the twentieth century and the answer will be clear.
Demonstrations of support towards the people of France and Paris all over the world have been attacked by people arguing that Sirian, Palestine, Sudaní and others lives matter too; yes they do. But social networks such as Facebook and Twitter are flooding with comments of people criticizing their "amies", in the Colombian case, arguing no French has changed their FB avatar to show sympathy with the civil war the country lives in. Others added to their avatars the flags of any other war scourged country.  Personally I agree up to a point with them, yes war has destroyed more lives in dozens of underdeveloped countries, including mine, perhaps the premise which argues all lives around the world are worth the same couldn’t be more accurate or right but developing from it an argument that smears the importance and relevance of what happened in Paris is nothing but a fallacy. I truly believe in freedom of thought and speech, that's in fact why I feel the duty to write, so I must express my total disagreement with all those people. First, a noble initiative, the one Facebook had with allowing users to add a French flag filter to their avatars, doesn’t deserve by no reason the attack of users. Second, this shows but the intolerance that fills the minds and hearts of people, finally it also proves how people can be easily driven to post and share without actually analyzing which is their position.
Also, the video of Reza Aslan can be easily refuted, I'm not an atheist, no; but this website provides a strong answer to Aslan's arguments.

miércoles, 18 de noviembre de 2015

L'EPILOGUE

What am I living? How come all this happened to me? From the 7 billion people that live in this tiny plane; why me?
It is worthless to complain, time-travel is a futile illusion. But, does all of this make me unique? Does the fight I am going through set me aside from all the others teens around the world? Am I worth God's concentration and effort to make all this timely happen to me?
It seems I am, everyone says I have a bright path ahead. Do I? Why do I even doubt? Why can't I just be patient? Why must I get anxious? How am I supposed to sail amidst of darkness?

"We were in a café in Rue des Vrais; it was the third of August of nineteen-eighty-six. The confetti carnival was over, I was smoking a Camel cigarette, while she was drinking some vodka in a fancy and uncomfortable cup; she looked stunning. We had already talked about Heidegger, Nietzsche, Van Gogh, Bismarck, De Gaulle, Churchill, López and Roosevelt. By that time we were drunk in knowledge, mixed with shots of russian vodka softened by meals so on."

Why is alcohol a critical element in writing? Eventually it becomes essential for story-telling. The cliché scenes of Sodoma's Consúl, the passages of Truman Capote's adventures, even the tales of Marquéz include alcohol or smoking. Movies and even songs are filled up with tons of those so called "social elements". Why are they even considered such?